U.S. outlook: reconciling strong surveys and a mediocre economic reality

US Outlook

In our latest market outlook, we wrote about the growing divide between strong survey-based measures of economic growth and weak actual consumer and business spending. This gap continues to be one of the biggest puzzles that economists are grappling with. Reconciling this issue has important implications for the near-term trajectory of the U.S. economy and market. Our analysis gives us reason for more cautious U.S. market expectations in 2017.

Surveys of consumer and business confidence spiked higher after President Trump’s election victory in November. The feeling was that, with Republican control of both the executive and legislative branches of government, the new Administration could deliver on sweeping tax cuts and regulatory reform. But progress in Washington, D.C. has proven slow1. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin recently said that the Administration’s August timeline for tax reform was now “highly aggressive to not realistic.”  Fiscal stimulus increasingly looks like a 2018 story.

This is all the more relevant because there is evidence2,3 suggesting that consumers and businesses may wait on the sidelines until these pro-growth policy initiatives take effect. This increases the risk of an “air pocket” scenario, in which the U.S. economy grows at a mediocre (2% or slower) pace in 2017.

Recent data on actual consumer and business spending have been weak and support this narrative. Real GDP growth slowed to 0.7% in the first quarter – the weakest it’s been in three years. Despite the highest levels of consumer confidence in a decade, real consumer spending was almost non-existent in the first three months of the year. And business investment also underperformed the growth rates suggested by the business surveys (see chart below). Early evidence for the second quarter doesn’t look much better. U.S. car sales were below expectations for the second month in a row in April and loan demand from consumers and businesses has slowed significantly in recent months.

Business sentiment and consumer confidence

Business sentiment represented by U.S. Institute for Supply Management purchasing managers index. Business economic data represented by real manufacturing orders for core capital goods. Source: Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Supply Management. Data as of March 2017. Consumer sentiment represented by U.S. consumer confidence index. Consumer economic data represented by U.S. personal consumption expenditures. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Conference Board. Data as of March 2017.

Against a backdrop of expensive U.S. equity market valuations, we believe a cautious tone is warranted. Non-U.S. markets offer a more compelling opportunity, in our view, across the key building blocks of a robust investment strategy: cycle, valuation, and sentiment. Economic and earnings growth have strengthened in Europe and the emerging markets and these markets continue to trade at relatively attractive valuation discounts to the United States.

The bottom line

In our view, the U.S. equity market is currently priced for perfection: current valuations—and sentiment—assume a seamless execution of the new Administration’s growth-oriented economic priorities. However, hard economic data—actual business and consumer spending—appear to reflect some uncertainty about the Administration’s ability to achieve such a seamless execution, given the political reality of governing in Washington, D.C. For the time being, we see more potential for investment opportunities outside the U.S.

1As my colleague Erik Ristuben recently pointed out, this is not necessarily a Republican problem. But rather a design feature of our government. It is very difficult to enact sweeping legislative change in the United States.

2The minutes of the Federal Reserve’s March FOMC meeting noted that “business contacts in several…Districts said they were waiting for more clarity about government policy initiatives before implementing capital expenditure plans.”

3The April NFIB survey noted that “small business owners are paying close attention, and they are making decisions that affect the economy based on how Washington performs. The drop in expected business conditions should be a warning to Washington that health care reform, regulatory reform, and tax reform have implications far bigger than politics.”

Disclosures: These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.

This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security.

Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.

Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type.

Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.

The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.

The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.

Russell Investments’ ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates with minority stakes held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners and Russell Investments’ management.

Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the “FTSE RUSSELL” brand.

The Russell logo is a trademark and service mark of Russell Investments.

Copyright © Russell Investments Group, LLC 2017. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an “as is” basis without warranty.

Russell Investments Financial Services, LLC, member FINRA (www.finra.org), part of Russell Investments.

RIFIS: 18781

  1. No comments yet.

Millennials are the future.
Engage them now.

Millennial InvestorSubscribe to the Helping Advisors Blog and receive a free copy of the Millennial Investor.

We will only use your email for Helping Advisors Blog updates.