Don’t neglect tax-aware investing in light of potential tax cuts. Potential tax reform doesn’t.

December 15, 2016 Categories: Portfolio Corner
Print this article

Trump Tax Plan

The last time I wrote about tax reform was in February 2014. At the time, then House Ways & Means Committee Chairman, David Camp (R-Michigan), published a tax reform package that attempted to make some of the very tough choices needed to simplify the existing tax code. It was detailed enough to draw criticism from both sides of the aisle. The split nature of the Congress and Presidency at the time meant that Camp’s proposal went nowhere.

Fast-forward 2 ½ years and the odds of tax code changes seeing the light of day in 2017 have suddenly increased. Tax cuts were an important part of President-elect Trump’s campaign and his party now controls both the House and the Senate, potentially making passage of a bill easier.

Admittedly, the President-elect’s tax proposal is light on specifics and the final bill, once through negotiations, will almost certainly look very different. In fact, even Trump’s Treasury secretary nominee, Steven Mnuchin, has described quite a different tax plan and House Speaker Paul Ryan’s (R-Wisconsin) proposal (“A Better Way”) from June 2016 is still on the table, too.

Either way, it doesn’t hurt to be prepared and understand the potential impact to investors of the President-elect’s current proposal.

The current proposal’s headline changes include:

  • Only three tax rates for taxable income

At the individual taxpayer level, the Trump proposal has fewer brackets and undoubtedly appears simpler. But this “simplicity” comes with a trade-off: this tax regime would likely produce material reductions in federal revenue, which introduces other challenges. It also could increase taxes for the lowest income earnings, while reducing them for the highest earners.

Current Trump Proposal for Married Filing Jointly (MFJ) Status:

Trump Proposal: MFJ Status

Current tax rates:

Current tax rates

  • Only three tax rates for Long Term Capital Gains and removal of Net Investment Income Tax

President Elect Trump campaigned on repealing the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) and its related Net Investment Income Tax of 3.8% on certain unearned income. At the same time, though, the current proposal would actually increase the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) rate for many taxpayers: The top LTCG rate would remain at 20%, but the top threshold would drop from $466,950 to $225,000 (for MFJ filing status). That means for taxpayers with taxable income between $250,000[1] and $466,949, the LTCG rate would increase by 1.2%, from today’s rate of 18.8% to 20%. Active, tax-aware strategies that that attempt to maximize after-tax investment returns through tax-loss harvesting, attention to holding period length, qualified versus non-qualified dividends, taxable interest income and municipal bond interest income, can help manage that potential increase in taxes due.

Meanwhile, investors with taxable income of at least $466,950 will experience a decline in their LTCG rate, from 23.8% to 20%. From a tax expense perspective, a 20% tax rate is clearly better than one at 23.8% – note the savings in the table below – but it is still not 0%. Investment taxes will continue to be a headwind for investment returns.

LTCG rate comparison

Current Trump proposal:

Current Trump proposal

Current tax rates:

Current tax rates

  • Changes to deductions and estate taxes (MFJ status)

President-elect Trump’s current tax proposal would increase the standard deductions and cap itemized deductions. Deductions are one of the issues on which Trump’s Secretary of Treasury nominee and he differ: Mnuchin stated that any reductions on the top taxpayers would be offset by fewer deductions. That is not the case as currently proposed. You can imagine the lobbying and posturing by impacted parties (e.g., housing industry, mortgage industry, charitable giving – and many more; the list is almost endless). These types of trade-offs are why proposing tax reform is much easier than actually getting it passed. Additionally, estate taxes would be entirely repealed.

Trump proposal - MFJ

  • Deductibility of municipal bond interest

To date, President-elect Trump has made no mention of changing the tax-free nature of municipal bond interest. Speaker Ryan’s plan referred to repealing “special-interest carve outs” from the tax code but did not mention any specific detail. It will undoubtedly be up for discussion, but state/local governments and individual investors will no doubt make sure their voice is heard.

The bottom line

Although the details on scope, size and who will be most affected are not quite clear, it is likely that there will be some form of tax cuts in 2017. But for investors, the main take away is: Taxes are not going to 0%. Helping clients retain more of what they earn after tax by considering tax-aware investment strategies will remain an important endeavor.

Disclosures:

[1] Note the discrepancy between $225,000 vs. $250,000 is due to the fact that the NIIT only applies to MAGI greater than $250,000.

These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and are current as of the date at the top of the page. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.

This material is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to purchase any security.

Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.

Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type.

Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth. As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.

The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.

The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.

Russell Investments’ ownership is composed of a majority stake held by funds managed by TA Associates with minority stakes held by funds managed by Reverence Capital Partners and Russell Investments’ management.

Frank Russell Company is the owner of the Russell trademarks contained in this material and all trademark rights related to the Russell trademarks, which the members of the Russell Investments group of companies are permitted to use under license from Frank Russell Company. The members of the Russell Investments group of companies are not affiliated in any manner with Frank Russell Company or any entity operating under the “FTSE RUSSELL” brand.

The Russell logo is a trademark and service mark of Russell Investments.

Copyright © Russell Investments Group, LLC 2016. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an “as is” basis without warranty.

Russell Investments Financial Services, LLC, member FINRA (www.finra.org), part of Russell Investments.

RIFIS: 18143

Tags:

  1. No comments yet.

Millennials are the future.
Engage them now.

Millennial InvestorSubscribe to the Helping Advisors Blog and receive a free copy of the Millennial Investor.

We will only use your email for Helping Advisors Blog updates.