Today’s ESG investing is not your father’s SRI
The tagline of the famous Oldsmobile ad campaign, “This is not your father’s Oldsmobile,” has taken on a life of its own since it first aired in the late 1980s. I find the tagline often creeps into my conversations when talking about things that are new or different, yet somehow akin to something established.
Most recently, the tagline came to mind when I was discussing Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing with a group of advisors. To many, ESG brings back memories of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) – which has typically employed an exclusionary screening based on social issues rather than investment issues. For example, electing to divest or not invest in: “Sin stocks,” like alcohol, tobacco, or pornography; or South African companies during the Anti-Apartheid Movement (originally known as the Boycott Movement) of the ‘70s and ‘80s; or fossil fuels today. Although on the face of it the two investment approaches may sound similar, I’m here to tell you that today’s “ESG investing is not your father’s SRI.”
Let’s unpack ESG by looking at:
- What is ESG investing?
- What is the appeal of ESG-focused products?
- How should advisors consider weighting ESG criteria relative to other product attributes and characteristics?
What is ESG investing?
ESG refers to environmental, social, and governance issues that an investor may consider when making investment decisions. Examples of ESG issues, include:
- climate change, air pollution, energy efficiency (‘Environment’ issues);
- gender and diversity, human rights, labor standards (‘Social’ issues);
- board composition, executive compensation, whistleblower schemes (‘Governance’ issues).
What is the appeal of ESG-focused products?
Many investors around the globe are interested not only in the financial outcomes of their investments – but also the impact their investments may have and the role their assets can play in promoting certain global issues. Such investors often cite a sense of responsibility to “do good,” socially and environmentally.
One generation increasingly interested in ESG investing is Millennials. According to the 2006 Cone Millennial Cause Study1, the majority of this generation is more likely to trust a company or purchase a company’s products when the company is considered socially or environmentally responsible. Conversely, roughly half of Millennials surveyed are more likely to refuse a product or service from a company who is considered socially or environmentally irresponsible.
How might advisors consider weighting ESG criteria relative to other product attributes and characteristics?
Investors have various motivations for taking ESG factors into account. While some may want their portfolio to reflect their own convictions about important global issues, others may see ESG as a potential way to impact investments positively. Either way, ESG considerations should not serve as a substitute for typical due diligence about the investment process of an investment. Rather, they can serve as a complement.
Another way in which today’s “ESG investing is not your father’s SRI” is that the implementation of ESG is more sophisticated than SRI. A limiting feature of SRI screens was that they typically were not investment-based. Rather, securities that did not meet some social or environmental criteria tended to be stripped out of the portfolio, without consideration for the investment implications. While the portfolios were deemed “socially responsible,” they often did not meet investor expectations for returns and therefore earned a sub-par reputation.
Recently, some of my colleagues published research which shows that active managers’ intent to add long-term value through security selection is leading many of them to ESG-type securities. While the manager may or may not be purposefully screening for ESG factors, their investment criteria often identifies securities which result in significant ESG tilts. This may indicate, from an investment standpoint, that ESG includes risks not normally included in financial statement analysis, and active managers are looking more holistically at security-level risks.
1 Cone. (2006). The Millennial Generation: Pro-Social and empowered to Change the World. The 2006 Cone Millennial Cause Study.
Russell Investments is a trade name and registered trademark of Frank Russell Company, a Washington USA corporation, which operates through subsidiaries worldwide, including Russell Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA. Russell Investments is part of London Stock Exchange Group.
Copyright © Russell Investments 2016. All rights reserved.
This material is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments. It is delivered on an “as is” basis without warranty.
Tags: investor behavior